The Myth of Charter Schools
Having just read
the article by Diane Kavitch, The Myth of
Charter Schools, I am left with a number of conflicting emotions. First, I did see part of the movie Waiting for Superman a while ago. I remember the children waiting in a big
auditorium with their parents, waiting for their name to be drawn to get into the
charter school of their choice. I
remember the tears and trauma of the students who didn’t make it. And I have to agree with Diane’s conclusion –
couldn’t they have humanely sent out letters to those involved, instead of
putting them through the pain and anguish of the lottery? (It reminded me in a small way of the lottery
in the Hunger Games…the need for a public audience.)
I guess I have
never thought of Charter Schools much before this year. I wasn’t aware of the huge debate around
them. I am a great lover of statistics
and details, though, and I really appreciated the statistics she included in her
article. Only one in five charter
schools show the extraordinary results proclaimed by many charter school
proponents. That means that 4 out of 5
do not. Only 17 percent performed better
on math test scores as compared to a matched public school, whereas 37 percent
performed worse than a matched public school.
I know that one
issue in our district this year is that we have a small number of students leaving
for two different new charter schools in our area. One is a high school with an agricultural
focus, which sounds wonderful. The other
one was started when a nearby town fought against the closing of their local
elementary school. I know that they used a lottery system to help with placement, so not everyone who applied got in their first year.
Both of these
are noble causes. I hope both schools end
up being in the top 20 percent of the charter schools. Our students here in Maine definitely deserve
it.
I also was
unaware that “for-profit” organizations see
charter schools as business opportunities, and are “advancing an agenda of
school privatization.” Where is any
governmental oversight? How can we have
organizations that are “mostly funded by the government but controlled by
private organizations?” I don’t know
enough about these to understand this part of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment